The content of the electronic media bill stirred concern among many, yet what stands out as encouraging and optimistic is the reaction from a large section of our society: citizens, media professionals, writers, and activists who are staunch advocates of rights and freedoms. Their response is a testament to a vibrant society wherein individuals are resolute in safeguarding their fundamental and universal rights, particularly the freedom of expression.
In conversations with several journalists, I discovered strong criticisms and concerns regarding the bill. It's important to note that the Kurdistan Region is yet to establish its own constitution. This parliamentary session and the government are burdened with various health and economic challenges, demanding our undivided attention.
On a different note, the undeniable truth is the chaotic and toxic landscape in both traditional media and social media platforms, where defamation and insult have become commonplace. This environment is largely propelled by politically funded social media, serving as another avenue for corruption.
While some individuals and parties might advocate for legislation to address this issue, I, myself, have been a victim of defamation on numerous occasions from various directions. However, I staunchly oppose any law that curtails the freedom of expression. I believe that a legal void is preferable to a law that authorities can exploit for their benefit.
A fundamental issue with this half-baked bill is its potential for abuse and the inherent risks it poses for citizens, many of whom are simply expressing their grievances. Fortunately, I personally don't maintain any unofficial pages or accounts, and I consider all Kurdish media as an extension of my responsibility. I am of the belief that any legislation aiming to regulate media would be used against institutions such as Awene, Hawlati, Spi Media, SharPress, and the Kurdistan Times. Officials' own channels, and social media needs to be protected, while preventing access to anonymous pages and accounts.
On this note, I welcome the withdrawal of the draft law until we reach the constitutional stage for the Kurdistan Region. Instead of pursuing the Electronic Media Law, let us collaborate to address gaps in existing legislation, such as the Press Law and the Law Prohibiting the Misuse of Communication Devices. The latter often burdens writers and journalists who are imprisoned under its provisions rather than those of the Press Law. If there are gaps concerning electronic media, these two codes can be refined and replaced according to international standards.
